Saturday, May 17, 2008

A Truly Liberating Theology

Perhaps one of the most frustrating ideals posited at the seminary that I attend is that of liberation theology. The way that it is posited is that oppressed groups, who have long been without voice in the theological realm, are given primacy in interpreting the Bible and discerning its meaning for everyone. As such, you have a variety of liberation theologies. There are Mujerista, Womanist, Feminist, Black, Hispanic, and other liberation theologies. Each setting up their own oppressed group as the diviners of Holy Writ.

The problem with all of this is that new groups of oppressors and oppressed are created. For example, Justo Gonzalez (in his book MaƱana) says both explicitly and implicitly that you can only 'truly' read the Bible if you are Hispanic...if you have experienced their oppression. What happens if you are Asian, Pacific Islander, African, or even Anglo? A theology of liberation that only liberates a few seems inconsistent with the Scriptures themselves.

After all, isn't it in John 3:16 that we read "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life"? It is the world that God desires to reconcile...not just one group of oppressed or the other.

Additionally, if we cast our gaze in the direction of Romans (specifically 6:19-23) we read, "I put this in human terms because you are weak in your natural selves. Just as you used to offer the parts of your body in slavery to impurity and to ever-increasing wickedness, so now offer them in slavery to righteousness leading to holiness. When you were slaves to sin, you were free from the control of righteousness. What benefit did you reap at that time from the things you are now ashamed of? Those things result in death! But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves to God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life. For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Jesus Christ our Lord."

A truly liberating theology, based on Paul's aforementioned words, must be ground in our liberation from the oppression of sin and death, which comes as an act of grace that is a gift of God. Simply put, liberation theology must offer liberation for all otherwise it is not truly liberating for anyone. It is not just the individual oppressions that God seeks to redeem us from (how we used the Scriptures to endorse slavery or to justify the crusades, or to justify a pure race as the German church did during the reign of Nazism...the list goes on ad infinitum). Rather it is the oppression of sin and death (of which all of the aforementioned examples and any others you could think of would fall under) that God redeems through his Son Jesus Christ on the cross. It is a redemption that was offered to all (Samaritan, Syrophoenicians, Ethiopians, Greeks, Romans, Jews, males, females, pharisees, etc) and is still offered to ALL today.

This, I believe, is where true liberation theology begins. We must stop being divisive. We must listen to and hear the voices that we have so long overlooked (especially here in the West). We must confess that no matter what our background or experience, we have been both the recipients and the perpetrators of oppression as defined by sin and death. Finally, we must turn to and embrace the grace that has been offered to us. It is only then that we, both corporately and individually, can be radically altered.

2 comments:

Nate Custer said...

Russel,

I really think you are pressing your argument too far here. Or perhaps just missing out on the main thrust of the liberation theologins.

Let me phrase it this way, is the phrase:

"Bless are the the poor, for yours is the Kingdom of God. ... But woe to you who are rich, for you are receiving your comfort in full."

More in line with liberation theologian who says that there is something about the good news of the kingdom that only make senses to someone who is poor or with your claims that liberation is more about a personal salvation from sin/death.

And don't give me any crap about poor in that verse really being poor in spirit. If you want an easy example of the tone deaf way rich people neuter texts that sing most potently for the poor, that is the first example.

Nate

D-$ said...

Russell,
This is the first time I have truly read this post inits entirety, and I must say...I love it. I was reading over some of those who espouse liberation theology and to say that it scares me is an understatement. How can we in one breath say that God is the redeemer of all and in the next say that he has somehow granted a special dispensation of grace and understanding to a select few? Doesn't that also inherently say that God somehow condones the enslavement and bruatlity experienced by some in an attempt to help them understand Him better? Doesn't that then make him into a feckless thug interested only in his narcisstic glory in the eyes of a select group and at the expense of others? Would thie be the God that we would want to serve?